<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>politicalese</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalese.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalese.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Total US Job Loss Discrepancy</title>
		<link>http://politicalese.com/total-us-job-loss-discrepancy/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalese.com/total-us-job-loss-discrepancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Grubbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalese.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+140,000,000 (total jobs in US) - 170,000,000 (jobs that will be lost, according Democrat Maxine Waters???) &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- (-) 30,000,000 Article: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/03/01/maxine_waters_says_170_million_could_lose_jobs_because_of_sequester]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+140,000,000 (total jobs in US)<br />
- 170,000,000 (jobs that will be lost, according<br />
Democrat Maxine Waters???)<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
(-) 30,000,000</p>
<p>Article: <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/03/01/maxine_waters_says_170_million_could_lose_jobs_because_of_sequester" target="_blank">http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/03/01/maxine_waters_says_170_million_could_lose_jobs_because_of_sequester</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalese.com/total-us-job-loss-discrepancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoke &amp; Mirrors is the rule for liberals</title>
		<link>http://politicalese.com/smoke-mirrors-is-the-rule-for-liberals/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalese.com/smoke-mirrors-is-the-rule-for-liberals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Grubbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalese.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smoke &#38; Mirrors is the rule for liberals such as Rachel Maddow {not the exception}. Any action like this by a conservative, would be the final nail, in their career ending coffin; however, this will likely become a resume enhancement for Maddow. Article: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2992736/posts]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smoke &amp; Mirrors is the rule for liberals such as Rachel Maddow {not the exception}.</p>
<p>Any action like this by a conservative, would be the final nail, in their career ending coffin; however, this will likely become a resume enhancement for Maddow.</p>
<p>Article: <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2992736/posts" target="_blank">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2992736/posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalese.com/smoke-mirrors-is-the-rule-for-liberals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bloomberg Accounting &amp; Twilight Zone Theorem</title>
		<link>http://politicalese.com/the-bloomberg-accounting-twilight-zone-theorem/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalese.com/the-bloomberg-accounting-twilight-zone-theorem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Grubbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalese.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[America owes so much money to her lenders that, these lenders can't possibly stop loaning funds to U.S. According to Bloomberg, borrowing an unlimited suppy of money, isn't pragmatic for individuals or familes. But somehow the same mathmatical formula that confers outright lunacy on a micro level, seems to somehow, mysteriously morph into a complex, but [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[America owes so much money to her lenders that, these lenders can't possibly stop loaning funds to U.S. According to Bloomberg, borrowing an unlimited suppy of money, isn't pragmatic for individuals or familes. But somehow the same mathmatical formula that confers outright lunacy on a micro level, seems to somehow, mysteriously morph into a complex, but feasible 'solution' for our governmenton {on a macro level}.]:</p>
<p>“We are spending money we don’t have,” Mr. Bloomberg explained. “It’s not like your household. In your household, people are saying, ‘Oh, you can’t spend money you don’t have.’ That is true for your household because nobody is going to lend you an infinite amount of money. When it comes to the United States federal government, people do seem willing to lend us an infinite amount of money. … Our debt is so big and so many people own it that it’s preposterous to think that they would stop selling us more. It’s the old story: If you owe the bank $50,000, you got a problem. If you owe the bank $50 million, they got a problem. And that’s a problem for the lenders. They can’t stop lending us more money.”</p>
<p>Article: <a href="http://politicker.com/2013/03/mayor-bloomberg-dont-panic-about-the-sequester/" target="_blank">http://politicker.com/2013/03/mayor-bloomberg-dont-panic-about-the-sequester/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalese.com/the-bloomberg-accounting-twilight-zone-theorem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USS Harry Truman in front line of Obama sequester cuts</title>
		<link>http://politicalese.com/uss-harry-truman-in-front-line-of-obama-sequester-cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalese.com/uss-harry-truman-in-front-line-of-obama-sequester-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Grubbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalese.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does it say about a U.S. President that will actually leverage, the safety of the American people, all in a very immature &#38; childish-effort, to try and manipulate, as much political power as possible? And, in a very public manner for all of America&#8217;s enemies to witness, docking by fiat, one of the most strategic [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it say about a U.S. President that will actually leverage, the safety of the American people, all in a very immature &amp; childish-effort, to try and manipulate, as much political power as possible?</p>
<p>And, in a very public manner for all of America&#8217;s enemies to witness, docking by fiat, one of the most strategic of defense military assets worldwide, a U.S. Navy {Nuclear} Aircraft Carrier.</p>
<p>There are countless billions {&amp; perhaps trillions} of wasted tax-dollars that, our government could cut or eliminate altogether, without jeoprodizing one-iota, of the well-being and/or safety, of the American people.</p>
<p>[But sadly, while the USS Harry S. Truman sits idly-by, docked via Obama's dictate, unable to defend the American people, Planned Parenthood &amp; other tax-payer-funded, organizations like it, ramp up 2013 operations, to radically &amp; heartlessly, exterminate more unborn babies than last year.]</p>
<p>Article here: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/9905111/US-carrier-in-front-line-of-Obamas-battle-with-Congress-over-85-billion-sequester-cuts-with-more-to-follow.html" target="_blank">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/9905111/US-carrier-in-front-line-of-Obamas-battle-with-Congress-over-85-billion-sequester-cuts-with-more-to-follow.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalese.com/uss-harry-truman-in-front-line-of-obama-sequester-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fearmongering&#8230; par excellence</title>
		<link>http://politicalese.com/fearmongering-par-excellence/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalese.com/fearmongering-par-excellence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Grubbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalese.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any sane individual that&#8217;s intellectually honest w themselves, is well aware that, Barack Obama has/is overtly violated/violating the U.S. Constitution. And hear again, the only item that Obama can find to cut, out of trillions of wasted tax-payer dollars {budget-wise}, is by fearmongering Americans, and freeing criminals into the general population. Why doesn&#8217;t Obama free [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any sane individual that&#8217;s intellectually honest w themselves, is well aware that, Barack Obama has/is overtly violated/violating the U.S. Constitution.</p>
<p>And hear again, the only item that Obama can find to cut, out of trillions of wasted tax-payer dollars {budget-wise}, is by fearmongering Americans, and freeing criminals into the general population.</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t Obama free newborn babies from certain death, by closing down tax-funded abortion clinics {Planned Parenthood} or triming the excessive fat, of all the deadweight, non-essential federal employees?</p>
<p>Obama has &amp; continues to be, manipulatively strategic, in these unnecessary cuts that do nothing but send a message of fear &amp; desperation, to the American people.</p>
<p>[History as recent as the US invading Iraq; whereby, Saddam Hussein, prior to US invasion, purposefully &amp; strategically, freed criminals as a means to perpetuate fear &amp; chaos w the Iraqi people.]</p>
<p>Article:<a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/03/01/v-fullstory/3261547/documents-us-released-more-than.html" target="_blank"> http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/03/01/v-fullstory/3261547/documents-us-released-more-than.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalese.com/fearmongering-par-excellence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shameful charitable giving</title>
		<link>http://politicalese.com/shameful-charitable-giving/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalese.com/shameful-charitable-giving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Grubbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalese.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Mitt Romney was running against Obama in the 2012 Election, Investors.com disclosed {http://tinyurl.com/8unrdww} that, when it came to charitable giving, the Romney&#8217;s gave 16% of their income, compared to the Obama&#8217;s {giving}, coming in at less than 1%. [Less than 1%. Shameful]. However, as pathetic a chasm, as separates these two percentages, it&#8217;s important [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Mitt Romney was running against Obama in the 2012 Election, Investors.com disclosed {<a href="http://tinyurl.com/8unrdww" target="_blank" rel="nofollow nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/8unrdww</a>} that, when it came to charitable giving, the Romney&#8217;s gave 16% of their income, compared to the Obama&#8217;s {giving}, coming in at less than 1%. [Less than 1%. Shameful].</p>
<p>However, as pathetic a chasm, as separates these two percentages, it&#8217;s important to consider that, the Romney&#8217;s 16% was an altruistic figure, when juxtaposed to the Obama&#8217;s &#8216;giving&#8217;.</p>
<p>In other words, the Romney&#8217;s gave out of their self-earned income, while paying for {their} everyday expenses, like the average American.</p>
<p>But unlike the Romney&#8217;s, 99.9% of the Obama&#8217;s expenses, were absorbed by the taxpayer {e.g. transportation, housing, food, clothing, vacations, etc.}.</p>
<p>So as embarrassing and shameful as it may seem that, the Obama&#8217;s gave less than 1%, when compared to the Romney&#8217;s 16%, in charitable giving, the percentages are far greater apart, than these simple stats indicate.</p>
<p>Article: <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/03/01/low_info_voters_believe_democrats_care_about_people_and_republicans_don_t" target="_blank">http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/03/01/low_info_voters_believe_democrats_care_about_people_and_republicans_don_t</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalese.com/shameful-charitable-giving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
